Obama has ordered the flag over the Whitehouse to be flown at half staff in respect to the people killed by gun violence in San Bernardino on Wednesday. His carefully worded proclamation states:

"As a mark of respect for the victims of gun violence perpetrated on December 2, 2015, in San Bernardino, California, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House..."

There were 16 people killed by gun violence on that day. Fourteen of those killed by gun violence were victims of Islamic terrorism. Two of those killed by gun violence that day were the Islamic terrorists who carried out the attack.

Our President should not be flying the flag a half staff in respect to those two terrorists, but he just can't help it. He should only be flying the flag at half staff for the fourteen victims of those Islamic terrorists.

We need a better President.

 

Not surprising.... Obama is a halfwit, no telling what he will do next....

 

Where does it say that he was flying it for the two perpetrators..... read it again.

It says "for the victims of gun violence".

The shooters weren't the victims.

 

Isnt the flag at half mast for " the victims of gun violence" ?

the murderes were not
They were not "victims" ,
and were not killed by "gun violence" .
They were murderers killed by legitimate action .

 

Obama was very careful to word his proclamation to include the two terrorists, without openly naming them, who fell victim to police gun violence during their attempted escape. Thank God for police gun violence.

By the way, when liberals give statistics about gun violence deaths in the U.S., those statistics include terrorists and criminals killed by police gun violence. If liberals don't consider terrorists and criminals killed by police gun violence to be victims, then they shouldn't include them in those statistics.

 

''GUN VIOLENCE'' . . not a fucking terrorist attack . . .but ''GUN VIOLENCE''

 

Why is it always with you guys that it is "Liberals" who are anti-gun. Right wingers can also hate them as Lefties can also like them.

 

It's all about the narrative.

 

What an ignorant thread.

 

Answer as to why it's always liberal anti gun protesters . If a normal everyday American is concerned about gun violence, he favors very strict harsh sentencing of the perpetrators of unlawful gun violence. Progressive anti gun zealots on the other hand DEMAND punishment for ALL gun owners instead of just the perpetrators of the crime. This has been rehashed over and over. Recently several automobile drivers have been charged with purposely driving into a crowd of people, as far as I know no progressives have called for limits of auto sales, such as prohibition of high powered auto's. When there are fatalities by automobile accidents, Bernie Sanders or President Obama does not immediately call for stricter automobile laws.

If you want to be taken seriously, you have to speak the truth. You cannot advocate punishment for law abiding citizens because of the actions of criminals.

 

Why don't you dumbfucks just show some respect instead of always pushing your own little pathetic agendas.

Hush....an alias

 

OMG
What a stupid and poinless comparison ,
automobile homicide with gun homicide
That has to go under
"Idiot Brigade"
surely .

For a start , if you had the same controls over guns as you do over cars ,
You wouldn't have such a problem.

every car has to be registered
ownership recorded
driver liscenced
very hard to conceal
one person can not conceal ,
or carry multiple cars.
can not fire off fifteem cars in 14 seconds
or 67 in a few minutes in a convention center
very hard to carry into a convention centre
onto a train or buss
through an airport onto a plane
into a church
or school

and basically
every car can be traced to its owner
every owner to their car/cars

can easily be stopped
searched
put off road
out of action
followed n watched

there are multiple reasons for stopping cars
searching them
disqualifying people from owning or using them

In short , there are far more rules and laws governing cars ,
and thier owners etc
And
unlike guns
their primary reason for developement , use and ownership ,
IS NOT FOR KILLING .

They are not really very efficient as killing mechines either.
generally much easier to avoid to.
Rather expensive ,
to buy , maintain , and use .

(just imagine having 12 of them hidden in your house rigged as explosive devices , not to mention enough to start a war)


mmm
no I dont think cars will be anyones choice of WOMM
any time soon

 

You're damn right respect is due to those that were senselessly killed that day.

YET, it's not all that sincere coming form POTUS, NOW IS IT?

Obama cant even call it what it is, it was a fucking ''terrorist attack'', not some random ''gun violence'' incident

Now I ask you, who has the fucking pathetic agenda?

 

Well now shootersa
I'm a lil confused

are you in fact actually
Mr Smith 36 ?

Or ,
is Mr Smith 36 really you Shootersa ?

please enlighten us

because I replied to mr smith's post , and you claim I missed YOUR point.

Was that a bit of a slip up maybe ?

it's a puzzle

 

I gave blood yesterday. Apparently they are strapped for blood in cali. Wash yourselves liberally in your stupidity. It makes my dick warm